Archives
- April 2025 (2)
- March 2025 (3)
- February 2025 (4)
- January 2025 (4)
- December 2024 (5)
- November 2024 (4)
- October 2024 (5)
- September 2024 (6)
- August 2024 (5)
- July 2024 (6)
- June 2024 (6)
- May 2024 (9)
- April 2024 (8)
- March 2024 (9)
- February 2024 (6)
- January 2024 (6)
- December 2023 (2)
- November 2023 (5)
- October 2023 (11)
- September 2023 (13)
- August 2023 (13)
- July 2023 (19)
- June 2023 (19)
- May 2023 (20)
- April 2023 (22)
- March 2023 (23)
- February 2023 (22)
- January 2023 (28)
- December 2022 (25)
- November 2022 (18)
- October 2022 (22)
- September 2022 (26)
- August 2022 (30)
- July 2022 (33)
- June 2022 (22)
- May 2022 (30)
- April 2022 (28)
- March 2022 (29)
- February 2022 (15)
- January 2022 (4)
- December 2021 (4)
- November 2021 (1)
- October 2021 (2)
- September 2021 (2)
- August 2021 (6)
- July 2021 (9)
- May 2021 (8)
- April 2021 (15)
- March 2021 (7)
- January 2021 (5)
- October 2020 (5)
- September 2020 (10)
- August 2020 (1)
- July 2020 (2)
- June 2020 (3)
- April 2020 (1)
- March 2020 (1)
- February 2020 (1)
- January 2020 (4)
- December 2019 (1)
- August 2019 (1)
- October 2018 (2)
- September 2018 (3)
- August 2018 (2)
- July 2018 (1)
- April 2018 (1)
- March 2018 (2)
- February 2018 (1)
- December 2017 (3)
- November 2017 (1)
- October 2017 (3)
- September 2017 (2)
- August 2017 (6)
- June 2017 (1)
- May 2017 (3)
- April 2017 (2)
- March 2017 (6)
- February 2017 (8)
- January 2017 (5)
- December 2016 (7)
- November 2016 (7)
- October 2016 (2)
- September 2016 (5)
- August 2016 (4)
- July 2016 (2)
- June 2016 (22)
- May 2016 (17)
- April 2016 (13)
- March 2016 (13)
- February 2016 (16)
- January 2016 (13)
- December 2015 (27)
- November 2015 (42)
- October 2015 (40)
- September 2015 (49)
- August 2015 (43)
- July 2015 (28)
- June 2015 (38)
- May 2015 (46)
- April 2015 (67)
- March 2015 (49)
- February 2015 (28)
- January 2015 (20)
- December 2014 (23)
- November 2014 (18)
- October 2014 (20)
- September 2014 (30)
- August 2014 (28)
- July 2014 (24)
- June 2014 (25)
- May 2014 (12)
- April 2014 (8)
- March 2014 (13)
- February 2014 (5)
- January 2014 (2)
- December 2013 (7)
- November 2013 (11)
- October 2013 (25)
- September 2013 (30)
- August 2013 (34)
- July 2013 (33)
- June 2013 (46)
- May 2013 (47)
- April 2013 (4)
- March 2013 (3)
- March 2011 (1)
- December 2008 (1)
- November 2008 (1)
- July 2008 (3)
- April 2008 (3)
- February 2008 (1)
- December 2007 (3)
- November 2007 (2)
- October 2007 (5)
- September 2007 (3)
- August 2007 (3)
- July 2007 (2)
- June 2007 (1)
- May 2007 (2)
- April 2007 (4)
- March 2007 (23)
- February 2007 (4)
- January 2007 (6)
- December 2006 (2)
- October 2006 (1)
- June 2006 (1)
- April 2005 (1)
- July 2003 (1)
- April 2003 (1)
- April 2002 (1)
- February 2001 (1)
- November 2000 (1)
- April 2000 (1)
- October 1999 (1)
- September 1999 (2)
- June 1999 (1)
- May 1999 (3)
- March 1999 (1)
- October 1998 (1)
- August 1998 (1)
- July 1998 (2)
- May 1998 (4)
- April 1998 (4)
- February 1998 (1)
- December 1997 (2)
- November 1997 (1)
- October 1997 (2)
- September 1997 (2)
- July 1997 (4)
- June 1997 (2)
- May 1997 (1)
- April 1997 (1)
- March 1997 (1)
- December 1996 (1)
- May 1996 (1)
Categories
- 念一瓢酌 Memory (28)
- 思一瓢酌 Thinking (1,013)
- 混沌一瓢酌 chaos (284)
- 獨語一瓢酌 soliloquy (441)
- 生一瓢酌 Life (223)
- 讀一瓢酌 Read (1,024)
- 遊一瓢酌 Traveling (47)
- 饒舌一瓢酌 Rapping (244)
Meta
Author Said Something
Daily Archives: July 18, 2021
大數據的傲慢與偏見
一位前華爾街量化分析師對遍布現代生活的數學模型發出警告——並威脅要撕裂我們的社會結構 我們生活在算法時代。越來越多的影響我們生活的決定——我們去哪裡上學、我們是否獲得汽車貸款、我們為健康保險支付了多少——不是由人類做出的,而是由數學模型做出的。從理論上講,這應該會帶來更大的公平:每個人都根據相同的規則進行判斷,並消除偏見。 但正如Cathy O’Neil在這本緊迫而必要的書中所揭示的那樣,事實恰恰相反。今天使用的模型是不透明的、不受監管的、無可爭議的,即使它們是錯誤的。最令人不安的是,它們強化了歧視:如果一個貧困學生因為貸款模式認為他風險太大(根據他的郵政編碼)而無法獲得貸款,那麼他就會與可以使他擺脫貧困的那種教育隔絕,惡性循環隨之而來。模特們支持幸運者並懲罰受壓迫者,創造了“民主的有毒雞尾酒”。歡迎來到大數據的陰暗面。 奧尼爾追踪一個人的生活軌跡,揭示了塑造我們未來的黑匣子模型,無論是作為個人還是作為一個社會。這些“數學破壞武器”對教師和學生進行評分、對簡歷進行分類、發放(或拒絕)貸款、評估工人、瞄準選民、假釋並監測我們的健康狀況。 O’Neil 呼籲建模者對其算法承擔更多責任,並呼籲政策制定者規範其使用。但最終,取決於我們對支配我們生活的模型變得更加精明。這本重要的書使我們能夠提出棘手的問題、揭示真相並要求改變。
Posted in 思一瓢酌 Thinking, 讀一瓢酌 Read
Leave a comment
文藝復興並不美
一幅迷人而又違反直覺的肖像畫,描繪了Michelangelo, Leonardo da Vinci, Botticelli等令人眼花繚亂的藝術品背後的骯髒、隱藏的世界。史學家低調不談的文藝復興黑暗史,為你揭露精緻視覺藝術背後的權力、縱慾與腐敗邏輯。 文藝復興時期被譽為文化重生和藝術創新的時期,它籠罩在獨特的美麗和輝煌光環中。它的名字讓人聯想到一個崇高理想的時代的令人敬畏的形象,在這個時代,生活模仿了它已成名的奇妙藝術品。但在新藝術和文化的巨大爆炸背後,隱藏著一個充滿強權政治、變態和腐敗的陰暗、惡性世界,它與當今的共同點比任何人都敢承認的要多: ‧漫步佛羅倫斯街頭時,可能會被住戶隨意傾倒的屎尿攻擊 ‧藝術家創作的動力源自暴力、私慾、歧視與衝突 ‧藝術贊助成為權力階級美化自我形象與贖罪的手段,品味最高的藝術鑑賞家,往往是當代最狡詐殘暴的人 ‧教會利用「信仰」斂財,教會職位成為人們競相爭奪的肥缺,教廷成為家族企業 ‧猶太教被視為否定基督神性的異端邪說,藝術家大展長才,在作品中鼓吹反猶太情結,˙致使社會氛圍充斥著徹底排斥,甚至殲滅猶太「威脅」的惡意。 ‧傲慢的佛羅倫斯人無視義大利以外的世界,將土耳其人與穆斯林描述成天性邪惡、野蠻、殘暴的種族;至於大西洋的民族與土地,則完全不值得藝術圈著眼,攤開文藝復興時期的繪畫、雕塑與文學作品,地理大發現彷彿從未發生。 在這幅生動而細緻的肖像畫中,文藝復興時期的學者Alexander Lee闡明了隱藏在那個時期最著名的藝術作品表面之下的黑暗而令人興奮的矛盾。充斥著詭計多端的銀行家、貪婪的政治家、性狂的牧師、血腥的競爭、惡毒的不容忍、猖獗的疾病以及奢侈和過度生活的故事,這種對文藝復興時期意大利腹地的扣人心弦的探索表明,遠非高思想理想,文藝復興時期的崇高紀念碑是由有缺陷和飽受折磨的藝術家創造的,他們生活在一個不斷擴大的不平等、黑暗性慾、偏執和仇恨的世界中。 “The Ugly Renaissance: Sex, Greed, Violence and Depravity in an Age of Beauty《文藝復興並不美:那個蒙娜麗莎只好微笑的荒淫與名畫年代》“是一段愉快的放蕩之旅,穿越意大利過去令人驚訝的矛盾,如果沒有大量的墮落和墮落,歷史上最偉大的傑作可能永遠不會出現。
Posted in 思一瓢酌 Thinking, 讀一瓢酌 Read
Leave a comment