Archives
- November 2026 (2)
- October 2026 (5)
- September 2026 (10)
- August 2026 (5)
- July 2026 (14)
- June 2026 (18)
- October 2025 (1)
- July 2025 (1)
- May 2025 (2)
- April 2025 (2)
- March 2025 (3)
- February 2025 (4)
- January 2025 (4)
- December 2024 (5)
- November 2024 (4)
- October 2024 (5)
- September 2024 (6)
- August 2024 (5)
- July 2024 (6)
- June 2024 (6)
- May 2024 (9)
- April 2024 (8)
- March 2024 (9)
- February 2024 (6)
- January 2024 (6)
- December 2023 (2)
- November 2023 (5)
- October 2023 (11)
- September 2023 (13)
- August 2023 (13)
- July 2023 (19)
- June 2023 (19)
- May 2023 (20)
- April 2023 (22)
- March 2023 (23)
- February 2023 (22)
- January 2023 (28)
- December 2022 (25)
- November 2022 (18)
- October 2022 (22)
- September 2022 (26)
- August 2022 (30)
- July 2022 (33)
- June 2022 (22)
- May 2022 (30)
- April 2022 (28)
- March 2022 (29)
- February 2022 (15)
- January 2022 (4)
- December 2021 (4)
- November 2021 (1)
- October 2021 (2)
- September 2021 (2)
- August 2021 (6)
- July 2021 (9)
- May 2021 (8)
- April 2021 (15)
- March 2021 (7)
- January 2021 (5)
- October 2020 (5)
- September 2020 (10)
- August 2020 (1)
- July 2020 (2)
- June 2020 (3)
- April 2020 (1)
- March 2020 (1)
- February 2020 (1)
- January 2020 (4)
- December 2019 (1)
- August 2019 (1)
- October 2018 (2)
- September 2018 (3)
- August 2018 (2)
- July 2018 (1)
- April 2018 (1)
- March 2018 (2)
- February 2018 (1)
- December 2017 (3)
- November 2017 (1)
- October 2017 (3)
- September 2017 (2)
- August 2017 (6)
- June 2017 (1)
- May 2017 (3)
- April 2017 (2)
- March 2017 (6)
- February 2017 (8)
- January 2017 (5)
- December 2016 (7)
- November 2016 (7)
- October 2016 (2)
- September 2016 (5)
- August 2016 (4)
- July 2016 (2)
- June 2016 (22)
- May 2016 (17)
- April 2016 (13)
- March 2016 (13)
- February 2016 (16)
- January 2016 (13)
- December 2015 (27)
- November 2015 (42)
- October 2015 (40)
- September 2015 (49)
- August 2015 (43)
- July 2015 (28)
- June 2015 (38)
- May 2015 (46)
- April 2015 (67)
- March 2015 (49)
- February 2015 (28)
- January 2015 (20)
- December 2014 (23)
- November 2014 (18)
- October 2014 (20)
- September 2014 (30)
- August 2014 (28)
- July 2014 (24)
- June 2014 (25)
- May 2014 (12)
- April 2014 (8)
- March 2014 (13)
- February 2014 (5)
- January 2014 (2)
- December 2013 (7)
- November 2013 (11)
- October 2013 (25)
- September 2013 (30)
- August 2013 (34)
- July 2013 (33)
- June 2013 (46)
- May 2013 (47)
- April 2013 (4)
- March 2013 (3)
- March 2011 (1)
- December 2008 (1)
- November 2008 (1)
- July 2008 (3)
- April 2008 (3)
- February 2008 (1)
- December 2007 (3)
- November 2007 (2)
- October 2007 (5)
- September 2007 (3)
- August 2007 (3)
- July 2007 (2)
- June 2007 (1)
- May 2007 (2)
- April 2007 (4)
- March 2007 (23)
- February 2007 (4)
- January 2007 (6)
- December 2006 (2)
- October 2006 (1)
- June 2006 (1)
- April 2005 (1)
- July 2003 (1)
- April 2003 (1)
- April 2002 (1)
- February 2001 (1)
- November 2000 (1)
- April 2000 (1)
- October 1999 (1)
- September 1999 (2)
- June 1999 (1)
- May 1999 (3)
- March 1999 (1)
- October 1998 (1)
- August 1998 (1)
- July 1998 (2)
- May 1998 (4)
- April 1998 (4)
- February 1998 (1)
- December 1997 (2)
- November 1997 (1)
- October 1997 (2)
- September 1997 (2)
- July 1997 (4)
- June 1997 (2)
- May 1997 (1)
- April 1997 (1)
- March 1997 (1)
- December 1996 (1)
- May 1996 (1)
Categories
- 念一瓢酌 Memory (28)
- 思一瓢酌 Thinking (1,017)
- 混沌一瓢酌 chaos (338)
- 獨語一瓢酌 soliloquy (441)
- 生一瓢酌 Life (223)
- 讀一瓢酌 Read (1,028)
- 遊一瓢酌 Traveling (47)
- 饒舌一瓢酌 Rapping (244)
Meta
Author Said Something
Author Archives: chongkinfai
語言、神死
當我們談及語言本身,是否即意味可分成許多種類?如人的語言、動物的語言……科學的語言?但細想,世上只有一種語言,那就是人的語言。語言的普遍性與具體實現之間構成了張力,並被銘刻在人的語言之中,從而使人的語言在內部撕裂:即便世上只有一種語言,我們仍須在普遍意義的語言(語言本身),以及它具體呈現(人的語言)之間作出區分。如是,語言成為一個只具單一種類的屬,這個種就是作為現實具體的個別物本身 若然用宗教的術語來說,人的語言這一描述即具神性的語言自身的墮落,它因在世的嫉妒、爭權、滛亂而汚損,且這是恒古不變結構的神性語言嵌入到變動不居的人類歷史之流中。這亦是神學中“墮落”的概念 同樣,若我們用這個思路去想。永生存於人之中,而不在神之中。人經由“靈魂”、“業karma”、文化傳承而永存,但神一死就什麼都沒有,頂多只會成為神話…… 也許有人會疑惑:神死了? 人背棄了信仰(廣義的),神也不是一樣也死了? 尼采《敵基督》、《查拉圖斯特拉如是說》的上帝之死不也是如此?對不信仰基督教、天主教的人,上帝確是死了
Posted in 獨語一瓢酌 soliloquy, 讀一瓢酌 Read
Leave a comment
ad hominem fallacies
X:ad hominem fallacies: argue for or against a position by appealing to personal characteristic of people who are advocating the position M:但有多少人能清晰? X: 嗯…. 我只為那麼簡單一個critical thinking 的introduction 已經足以反駁而驚訝 M: 不知外國人是否如此。中國人往往因“隱惡揚善”而不愛去批評,而且往往認為批評是不好、有傷和氣、不能顧存對方颜面……但却忘了、或分不清批評是對人、或事。又無論出於好、壞,對當事人始終是個反省的好機會,也許這與教育有莫大關係 X: 應該外國人也有的,多常見就不知了 甚麼教育會導致這情況? M: 父母長輩不容自己的孩子錯、或輸了給人、或失敗…… X: 容許犯錯和鼓勵從錯誤中學習的教育有沒有可能也是對人不對事? M: 事總由人所做成,沒有人就沒有事。因而應看成人於特定情況、特定事情所促成的不恰當(錯誤),而批評只涉及於此「特定」,而與做成此「特定」的人的人格予以分開(雖然此亦可能有很大因素與人格 ~ … Continue reading
Posted in 思一瓢酌 Thinking, 獨語一瓢酌 soliloquy
Leave a comment
夢
中國是個夢中之國,中國人是個只會尋夢、而空有理想、或不是理想而是幻想的族裔。在上的在尋夢,在下的也在尋夢;即使在電影的表現中也只是在虛空中尋夢……民族夢、英雄夢
Posted in 獨語一瓢酌 soliloquy
Leave a comment
中國人……
從孟子的義利之辨、鄧小平的黑猫白猫論、到演偽人的嘴臉、移了民的中國人的突然愛國、以至無數中國人的突然愛國……在再顯示中國人是蠅頭小利的民族。這也說明了中國人何以如此奴性、何以未能走向開放社會的國度的原因 「啱嘅嘢」要看甚麼人做
Posted in 讀一瓢酌 Read
Leave a comment
相思紅塵
相思紅塵 眼過無痕 情久久 恨長長 怎奈何 劍起渺渺峰巒 遥見繁煙紛飛落 百花謝 大夢似長歌 夢濕空階 最是人間留不住 朱顏辭鏡花辭樹
Posted in 念一瓢酌 Memory, 混沌一瓢酌 chaos
Leave a comment
中國
毛澤東把中國帶向一個鬥爭的社會 鄧小平把中國帶向一個貪腐的社會 確實,鄧小平的實用主義把中國帶向一個萬劫不復之地 …… 一個非理性的自私、一個極端的資本主義社會: – 土地、水源的汚染沒有六十年以上不能復原過來,經濟上的得益將成為未來醫療的代價、甚至可能更悲慘…… – 食物的汚染使中國由稻米、大豆的出口國變成入口國,從而帶來各種各樣的做假,人民的健康成為經濟成長的代價…… – 為了高速的經濟成長,把所有資源都用上。結果犧性了所有人民的福利,從而帶來嚴重的醫療失誤。人民負擔不起看醫生的錢,醫生受不了整個制度的崩潰、漸漸再没有人願意當醫生,假醫院、器官販賣事做頻生……
Posted in 混沌一瓢酌 chaos
Leave a comment
尊重
人與人的相處要建立在互相尊重之下,即使是父母兄弟姐妹亦不能例外。人與公司、人與政府、政府與其隸屬的機構等等,雖說是有種從屬的關係。但若然雙方面不能互信、互重,而只有單向的指令、亦唯只有單向的指令,那其後果很簡單: 少做少錯、不做不錯,如此的公司、機構、政府只具軀殼的死組織、死城,那要來做什麼? 做為一個老師、父母、上司、政府…對學生、子女、下屬、人民…只要求其千依百順,那這上下的關係跟本不是一種好的關係; 甚至根本不是一種關係,而是一種敵對。試問這樣的學校、家庭、公司、國家有可能好?有可能幸福?有可能有業績?有可能強大嗎?…… 北京与香港:摸索的悖论
Posted in 混沌一瓢酌 chaos
Leave a comment
Ethics of Voting
Ethicists say voting with your heart, without a care about the consequences, is actually immoral W:“投票只是用心而不顧及後果的人,實際上是不道德。” 對於這種講法,可如何思考? H: 那要看’後果’是什麼意思。如果後果是要維持現狀穩定或其它利益/好處,或後果是要重奪一國主權,那麼W所引的會引起很大的不同辯論。又,所謂的不道德、,是基於那個立場説不道德。小弟有感,此次英國公投事件有點像小型版反環球化,即是次是反歐洲一體化… M:W所提問題即我貼出上述 Ethicists say voting with your heart, without a care about the consequences, is actually immorall 一文中所講的;亦可參考Jason Brennan的“The Ethics of Voting”一書 W: … Continue reading
Posted in 思一瓢酌 Thinking, 混沌一瓢酌 chaos
Leave a comment
神
一切對神的描述都是對自我理想形像的建構。神學也就是個體系統地對神的抒情。什麼是神?神就是人類理想化的形像,因而無論經歷多少世代,神的形像都能永繼存在,在人類不繼修正自身理想中演化着……
Posted in 獨語一瓢酌 soliloquy
Leave a comment